Public sample deal · bounded view

Riverton Landing Hotel

Select-service · 102 keys · Riverton Airport Market · T-12 ending June 30, 2026

70source values1conflict

Hold

Coverage on the financing proposed in the OM is using underwriting NOI; the ask is above the value the OM’s own financing and return terms support. The seller’s rooms-revenue claim exceeds the operator statement by .

RGI / RevPAR Index

Data dependent · not computable

Property RevPAR / Comp-Set RevPAR * 100

Property RevPAR$117.48Computed
Comp-Set RevPARMissingRequired input

No index value was emitted. The property side computes, but the package carries no competitive set.

Property RevPAR

$117.48

Riverton_Landing_Market_Overview.pdf page 1

Confidence · High

Competitive-Set Coverage

No competitive set is included in this package.

Riverton_Landing_Market_Overview.pdf page 1

Confidence · High

Property RevPAR ancestry

Glass box · lineage

  1. Public sample
  2. RGI input
  3. RevPAR
ComputedRevPAR$117.48

Division · 2 operands

  1. SourceRooms Revenue$4,373,655.00
  2. ComputedAvailable Rooms37,230

    Multiplication · 2 operands

Three Riverton Landing documents

Source confidenceHigh · categoricalNumeric stage scores not emitted
  • Operating statementRiverton_Landing_T12_Operating_Statement.xlsx
  • Offering memorandumRiverton_Landing_Offering_Memorandum.pdf
  • Broker market overviewRiverton_Landing_Market_Overview.pdf

Broker market overview

Harbor Crest Lodging Advisory (fictional)

T-12 ending June 30, 2026
Transient
62%
Group
24%
Contract
14%
  • Airport-oriented select-service lodging
  • Weekday demand from logistics, aviation, and regional corporate accounts
  • Weekend demand supported by youth sports and visiting-friends-and-relatives travel

Competitive-set coverage · absentNo competitive set is included in this package.Riverton_Landing_Market_Overview.pdf · page 1

Three views. Three approved evidence paths.

Plain figures are intentionally non-interactive. Evidence appears only on the bounded public subset.

Variance = Underwriting − T-12 (default); Underwriting − Pro-Forma (secondary).

Prior year not extracted
Not extracted ›

not computable — view not extracted

Riverton Landing Hotel operating statement with T-12 Actual, OM Pro-Forma, and Underwriting views. Three cells expose bounded public evidence.
AccountT-12 ActualOM Pro-FormaUnderwritingUnderwriting − T-12Underwriting − Pro-Forma
Rooms Revenue$5,040,000$4,373,655$0−$666,345

Designed break · both sources

Current T‑12 rooms revenue

$4,800,000 seller$4,373,655 operator$426,345 overstatement

Seller package

Riverton_Landing_Offering_Memorandum.pdf page 1

Seller-stated current T‑12 Rooms Revenue$4,800,000

Operator statement

Riverton_Landing_T12_Operating_Statement.xlsx T‑12 Operating Statement!B14

Rooms Revenue$4,373,655

Food & Beverage Revenue$385,000$404,250$385,000$0−$19,250
Other Operated Revenue$142,500$149,625$142,500$0−$7,125
Miscellaneous Income$96,845$101,687$96,845$0−$4,842
Total Operating Revenue$5,695,562$4,998,000$0−$697,562
Rooms Expense$1,181,000$1,310,400$1,181,000$0−$129,400
Food & Beverage Expense$300,300$311,273$300,300$0−$10,973
Other Operated Expense$92,625$95,760$92,625$0−$3,135
Total Departmental Profit$3,424,075$3,978,129$3,424,075$0−$554,054
Administrative & General$419,832$455,645$419,832$0−$35,813
Sales & Marketing$612,279$701,089$612,279$0−$88,810
Property Operations & Maintenance$249,900$273,387$249,900$0−$23,487
Utilities$229,908$250,605$229,908$0−$20,697
Information & Telecom Systems$99,960$113,911$99,960$0−$13,951
Total Undistributed Expenses$1,611,879$1,794,637$1,611,879$0−$182,758
Gross Operating Profit (GOP)$1,812,196$2,183,492$1,812,196$0−$371,296
Management Fees$0$0$149,940$149,940$149,940
Franchise Fees$0$0$0$0$0
Insurance$74,970$78,000$74,970$0−$3,030
Property Taxes$149,940$157,000$60,760$53,700
Rent / Ground Lease$0$0$0$0$0
EBITDA$1,587,286$1,948,492$1,376,586−$210,700−$571,906
Reserve for Replacement (FF&E)$199,920$227,822$199,920$0−$27,902
Net Operating Income (NOI)$1,387,366$1,720,670$1,176,666−$210,700−$544,004

Computed signals, without invented severity

The producer emitted values for all eight flags, but no benchmark reference or severity classification. This view keeps that state explicit.

Producer flag values
FlagComputed valueSeverity state
F1FF&E Reserve % of Revenue4.0%Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F2Implied Assessed Value (trailing tax / property-tax rate)$15,300,000Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F3Pro-forma NOI Overstatement %46.23%Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F4Pro-forma Flow-Through %53.2%Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F5Management Fee % of Revenue3.0%Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F6Asking-vs-Supported Spread %62.42%Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F7DSCR1.02×Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable
F8Facility Fee in Miscellaneous Income (placement signal)$0Severity not classifiedBenchmark reference unavailable

Published depth ends here

On this page, in full

24 mapped statement lines plus the re-footed variance · 3 engine views with the prior-year absence stated honestly · 2 drilled lines · 1 withheld metric, naming the input it lacked · 4 digests.

Not on this page

Depth
The full drill-through — every intermediate node between a figure and its cell, at the depths this slice does not publish
Mapping
The complete USALI mapping — every line against the source cells it was built from, not only the lines drilled here
Code
The executed kernel source for each metric, at the revision this run used

The line sits where the manifest puts it. keytwelve-public-slice-manifest.v1 declares 3 interactions and a maximum drill depth of 2, and everything it declares is on this page at that depth — the cut is declared, not hidden. What is below it is the same machinery run against your own package, which is a different thing from a longer version of this one.

Request access →

Fit criteria are stated before the form · reviewed by a person

Artifact provenance

Recomputed 2026-09-15 from the sealed extraction in a clean environment — identical

Model-assisted extraction reads the documents; the arithmetic downstream of extraction does not vary between runs.

Artifact
v1.2.1
Kernel registry
0.9.0
Sealed extraction
sha256:10b56b4633e5472cd34efaddfdb86c8f1ba20d9308157c75e2c86511747d44e9
Run ID
producer:602bc661e4a2d9aa9a5c17573154962798d8f61cecd6b882e3a13ebf2314605b
Fixture manifest
sha256:b0250bed3ce927390e516ae8e170c73ed4129e2f88b83e829bb89291a422e5ec
Sealed Deliverable
sha256:f730e14b43a955934c63126b5fef374d959df8f4c8a9579873af31c86c7fa305
Producer evidence
sha256:41cd9a61b3061483bd2549d9b8f8c6cda0652e8f253beaa7d30c0f3925c4a43b
Post-seal verification
sha256:b9e9c5b4487b0330eaf90bba6f18f022583b06f3ed856cd8a503329ff64c9448

Synthetic public demo regression · not a golden anchor and not ratification evidence

Recomputed from the sealed extraction in a clean environment; the reproduction report lists both runs' hashes against the digests shown here.